Shields Index

1 Plantagenet impaling Hainault
2 Plantagenet impaling de Bohunt
3 Bourchier impaling Plantagenett
4 Chichester impaling Bourchier
5 Courtenay quartering de Redvers impaling Champernowne.t
6. Chichester impaling Chamernowne
7. Coppleston impaling Chichester
8. Bamfylde impaling Coppleston
9 Bastard impaling Bamfyldet
10 Pollexfen impaling Specott
11 Pollexfen impaling Stretchley
12 Pollexfen impaling Woollcombe
13 Pollexfen impaling Harris
14 Bastard impaling Pollexfent
15 Vere impaling Cecilt
16 Herbert impaling Vere
17 Poullett impaling Herbert
18.Poulett impaling Bertiet
19 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Poulett.
20 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Worseley
21 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Pownoll
22 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Wymondesold.
23 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Woollcombe
24 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Foster
25 Dexter, quarterly of nine pieces
26 Bastard impaling Crispin
27 Bastard impaling Rodney
28 Bastard impaling Fitz Stephen
29 Bastard quartering Pollexfen impaling Scrope
30 Bastard impaling Besilles
31 Bastard impaling Damarell
32 Gilbert impaling Compton
33 Bastard impaling Gilbert
34 Boleigh impaling Bodrigan
35 Killiowe impaling Boleigh
36 Killiowe impaling Trevillian
37 Bastard impaling Killiowe
38 Reynell impaling Walrond
39 Reynell impaling Fortescue
40 Bastard impaling Reynell
41 Hele impaling Glanville
42 Bastard impaling Hele
43 Bampfylde impaling Wadham
44 Bampfylde impaling Drake

Welcome to Kitley Heritage
Introduction Terminology Guided Tour of the Shields
References | Exhibits | Heritage Video

12/ Quarterly 1 & 4 Argent a lion rampant gules 2 & 3 Azure Impaling Argent three bars gules – Pollexfen impaling Woollcombe

It is with this marriage that the established sources proved not only to be inadequate in the information which they provided, but also seriously in error in the essential genealogy. The full details of the investigations which finally unravelled the true relevance of the Pollexfen/Woollcombe, impalement displayed at Kitley can hardly by related here – a detailed account of research into the Pollexfen pedigree conducted by the present writer is available in another bookley – and the findings will have to be briefly summarised.

Basically, it has now been established absolutely that the so called “inheritance” in the descent of the Kitley Pollexfens passed through a secondary branch of the family, through the marriage of a Nicholas Pollexfen to a Petronell Woollcombe – neither of these persons are even named in Vivian’s pedigree (amongst a large number of other Pollexfens who are missing from the family tree which he provides). On the contrary, the principal Pollexfen lines inherited Nutwell & Stancombe &c (which is a well publicised fact) and Mothecombe (which appears to have escaped the notice of previous writers), and they also owned other valuable properties in the South Hams (a fact which had also previously been neglected).

However, research has not only identified the principals which are essential to an understanding of the Bastard ancestral lines, but also some dates – the marriage of Nicholas Pollexfen to Petronell Woollcombe took place c1629; Nicholas died on 29th March 1642, and his widow Petronell on 20th October 1679, both buried at Yealmpton. Most importantly, the wills of both husband and wife have also been found, which prove absolutely their relationships to other Pollexfens, and all of their children have also been positively identified (q.v. shield 13).